12/20/2023 0 Comments Horse simulator 3d wtf![]() ![]() To counter this, the limitations imposed on nomads didn't really solve the problem and were just annoying. It never worked from a balance perspective and resulted in an incredibly easy and boring playstyle which completely glossed over the core gameplay that made CK2 enjoyable. ![]() The problem is that nomads introducing a whole new set of mechanics that worked completely differently to everyone else was a mess. I love nomads, it's a part of history I'm really interested in and would love to see represented properly. Thematically, horse lords is my favourite CK2 DLC. I would like to see the CK3 version be less scripted and something everyone can interact with rather than just free money for some regions. Sure, the ones in CK2 did kind of feel like cheating sometimes. ![]() Plagues, sure, those were pretty fun and flavourful if a bit insubstantial.īasic economic mechanics. That said, going full roman empire world conquest mode would be complex and challenging enough in I:R that a certain type of person would definitely be really into it. For me, the most fun achievements are forming small but powerful nations and trying to push them as hard as possible with limited territory and resources.īasically, imposing limitations and then seeing how far you can go within those limitations is just extremely satisfying when you have the right mechanics to do it. Ironically, I think it can be a frustrating game to play very wide in because you start spending a lot more time putting out fires (figuratively) which is a bit more reactive than I like to play. As a strategy game though, I think it is wonderful and if you can find a personal challenge that you enjoy you can easily get into doing it over and over again. ![]() The narrative justification for whatever you're doing is very thin in I:R and it doesn't have a strong sense of immersion in the way some other games do. I have a feeling its going to end up like Victoria 2, with a cult following of people who are really hardcore and passionate about it (including me). It has some challenge, it has some balance and it definitely is much more cohesive.įinal remark: I am disappointed in CK3 because I care so much about CK2 and want its successor to be better. I will also say that CK2 is also an easy game once you're intimately with all of its facets, so I only play with serious overhaul mods that make it more challenging and interesting, such as CK2+ and HIP, but at least I enjoy CK2 without mods. Merchant republics and nomads shouldn't be ported 1-to-1, and societies didn't add anything worthwhile to CK2. Worth noting is that I don't mind some content missing in CK3 right now. If you don't understand what I mean, enjoy this very well written semi-AAR.įinally, consider it from my perspective, a veteran of CK2, with about 4000 hours played and likely about half that time spent modding on top of it: CK3 makes me want to play CK2. To an extent, I would even say it's not a strategy game, since I only have to click my win-button of choice and the game will adjust accordingly, handing me my requested victory. CK3 is not a challenging game for veterans, is not a balanced game and is not a cohesive game. Unfortunately, very little of all that potential is being put to use in CK3 right now. The technical backing of the game is much improved for modding and the current systems for religion and culture certainly are much more flexible than they are in CK2. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |